How bad is the residential world right now? Its funny in January, I was at the Builders Show and everyone was playing off this fake confidence that things are fine and so on. Now 11 months later, the truth is that it’s an absolute mess. MI Window announced its closing its
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Horrors on the Residential Side
Saturday, October 27, 2007
Saturday with Green Issues and NFRC comments
A few loose ends to cover….
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
A Seriously Interesting Coalition
On Wednesday I sat in on an open forum meeting of the Advanced Building Coalition. It was an amazingly diverse group of people. You had of course protectors of the industry there (GANA) along with primary glass manufacturers and 2/3rds of the top fabricators. Then you had code officials, government officials (DOE and HUD), and plenty of energy related groups. Plus you had non glazing folks too so it really made for an interesting meeting. The theme of the meeting was how to approach the governments plan to reduce energy in buildings by 30% by 2010 and 50% by 2020. 11 people representing every background imaginable gave short presentations and thoughts on what could/may/possibly happen when this 30% goal becomes law/code.
To me the most interesting take came from Todd Taylor of the Professional Northwest National Laboratory. He noted that getting to 30% is not as simple as people think because there are so many factors that need to be addressed. He noted regional differences, building differences, fuel types and non code regulated items among the many reasons on why this effort will take time to muster. But that said, the DOE representative on the panel was pretty focused on the fact that this will happen and according to a surprising Memo of Understanding that was released today from 4 organizations (ICC, AIA, Alliance to Save Energy and ASHRAE) the drive to get it done could be there. Long way to go, but energy focus and code advancements are surely coming, so get ready. I’m going to write more on this meeting either later this week or next.
Elsewhere…
“You are the experts, you are the pulse in the field….” Yes we are, can you pass that on to the fine folks at the NFRC…. They’ll ignore you, but it sure would be nice if someone from DOE would tell them that instead of listening to NFRC tell you how we’re all evil greedy manufacturers who hate things like Low E.
-- Mr. Majette and many others also talked about how costs will go up in order to meet the energy goals… because of higher end, better products…. So again that brings me to our pals at NFRC… if their program is expensive, and you know it will be, how will that impact the goals of the government? You know its one thing to pay more for product, its surely another to have to pay a ransom to have a professionally produced product tested, re-tested and vetted, so some people can make profit. Now more than ever, with this on the horizon, I believe that NFRC’s CMA effort will fail miserably unless it becomes a ton more user friendly, less invasive and surely less expensive.
-- While I am on subjects that make me nuts… did you see that
-- Speaking of Guardian… if you have not seen their new Sun Guard website (CLICK HERE) then you are missing out. Fantastic site, extremely informative and detailed. And yes while I’ll be accused of drinking the Guardian Kool Aid, I have to compliment because if you have worked on a website, you know it’s A LOT harder than it looks, so I have to give proper kudos to the folks behind it, because it’s simply tremendous. Congrats guys.
-- And no, I am not on their payroll.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
The Best and Worst months of the year.
You know I both love and hate this time of year. I love the season, fall, cooler weather, leaves changing, Halloween candy- leading into Thanksgiving (best holiday IMO) and the great month of November. But the hatred comes from how these two months are for our industry. It is simply the worst 2 months we have. Everyone is swamped. Everyone is pressured. Plus it has been a while since that relaxing summer vacation and the Christmas holidays are way too off in the distance, so everyone is a bit more on edge. And of course, everyone needs their product YESTERDAY. Especially in any region where there is snow, the October/November runs are all extra pressured because everyone wants their buildings closed in before the “snow flies.” Customers and suppliers who get along great for 10 months of the year are at each others throats in these two months and its like this EVERY YEAR and it sucks. Anyway I am counting down the days til December while trying to enjoy the best/worst 2 months of the year.
-- So the Architectural Billings Index went down again eh? While it’s still above water, the downward trend should be a worry. Now keep in mind this is for projects going 9 to 12 months from now, so it’s a while away, BUT, its also about that time… end of 08, early 09 that the experts were calling for tough times. Next months ABI will be very telling.
Saturday, October 13, 2007
Saturday with More and new Chinese Toy
A reader reminded me about the last NFRC "outreach" it was was $30,000 grant to Board member Gary Curtis,for his organization to educate architects on this new program.... So SEE they have been trying... but remember they only try by giving money to one of their own...
Another reader pleaded with me to not "give in" on the need if this issue. I am not giving up, but there are certain things that can be done and others that can't. Plus with how big of a mess this is, it may blow up all by itself.
I did get one dissenting opinion, stating that there is a serious need for what NFRC brings... and to that I say... the only people who would benefit from the way the system is set up now and the way the Board truly wants to set it up are:
1. People who see NFRC Cert as a "revenue stream" and yes there is at least 2 folks out there who can't wait for it to happen, because they think they can make money from it
2. People who think that NFRC cert will legitimize their products that either don't deserve it or have bad reputations.
That's it. Because how the NFRC Board wants it, no normal industry stakeholder will see any value or need.
And of course I need to always add this....
I have no problems with a program to rate whole system calculations. And I don't have a problems with a certification program that could work with it. The problems will always lie in the inane and overwrought oversight and the lack of care/knowledge from the people attempting to implement it. Plus competition would be nice eh? I mean don't you and I have competition? Why does the NFRC have the same rights as the IRS?
Last- I also had 1 call and 1 e-mail to please not forget about China... and trust me I won't. The China issue is 1000 times worse than the NFRC. While the NFRC could ultimately destroy themselves, the Communist Chinese won't and vigilance is a must.
More proof... despite all the recalls, the exports still keep coming and it WILL GET WORSE! Especially in our industry. Click HERE for the story.
And from a reader (Thanks David!) this great picture of the latest toy recall from China... CLASSIC!
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
The Blog turns 2 and the NFRC is still here...
Big day here at the blog, as we celebrate our 2nd birthday…. Amazing. While the first year was spotty, the 2nd year has been pretty darn good and I thank you for that. Actually I should thank everyone from EFCO and
Elsewhere….
Because
A: They Can! They are a 501c3 and they can do whatever they want, even invade
and
B: The people who make money off of their NFRC memberships would lose out in a deal like this. If a manufacturer could do his own calculations, what would that to do the business of all of the labs and consultants who MAKE MONEY from stuff like this? So the board, in trying to protect their own, went against an overwhelming vote. Believe me they’ll breakout the argument of third party certs and “trust” but if the labs, consultants, and IA’s weren’t making money off of this it would be approved. Oh and you would think that the DOE would wake up and take notice of this? Nah, they are completely and pathetically snowed.
The bottom line is, and I have said it many times, our industry embraces and welcomes efficiency. We want to sell and manufacture value added products (even though some NFRC members have poisoned the minds of the DOE telling them, we don’t like to produce Low E!) and we are all for a fair, simple and credible system to rate whole systems.
What we are against is the blatant profit motive of those involved. Like the example above, they prove that their goal is to make money, not create a workable program.
Wednesday, October 03, 2007
Don't worry the deals will be coming....
A big driver of traffic to this blog has been the insight into the “deals” that have happened recently in our industry. So because of that, I get e-mails constantly either giving me “scoop” or asking me what’s next. As for the scoop, I really do vet it completely, as an example, when I first heard that EFCO was being bought by
I'm not going to speculate on what the future looks like because at any point in time, things could occur.
Now am I the only one who is seeing something there? The question did not ask are you going to sell the flat side but “what’s the outlook” and to me I think the answer would just be rosy talking about products and potential and so on. Also I guess the reason my radar goes off is usually the answer in that case is like Vistawall’s was when they were asked 6 weeks before the Oldcastle deal if they were selling.
"We currently operate successful businesses throughout North America (North Star BlueScope Steel,
I don’t know maybe her answer which makes you think something is up is reverse psychology… I guess time will tell.
Tuesday, October 02, 2007
Color me STUNNED
You can read the lettter HERE. It was well written and brings up some interesting points.
Welcome to the party guys.... its a nice first step, and hopefully its not the last. This letter will not even make a dent in the NFRC machine, they'll respond to it breaking out all of their famous lines about "protecting the public stakeholder" and "California's demanded it" and "Its Green" and "we're a 501c3" and "our mandate from congress" and "ISO is gonna do it" so on.
A nice second step would be to send a letter to the DOE and educate them and let them know of your opinion. Plus joining the NFRC (so you can vote) and attending the meetings works too.
((At this point I know you'll say, if they are against it, why join? Well to truly affect change it has to happen from within. As much as I dog NFRC, they are not a fly by night organization. They are connected at the DOE. And the DOE and others will always say "did you go to the meetings? did you vote?" when they discuss the issues with you- plus the NFRC WILL develop a program, like it or not, so you may as well try as hard as you can to make it simple and realistic))
Anyway, while I do not see this as stopping the current effort by NFRC, it is promising that NGA has finally weighed in and I can only hope that they will follow through and truly make this a priority to protect their membership.
Wow, last week the NGA is on TV talking about glass and now this... I am really stunned.