Thursday, June 28, 2007
FInishing Thoughts
-- One the most popular search terms on Google today was "Vistawall Oldcastle" as I think so many people after the news broke wanted to gauge reaction.
-- I am feeling for the a lot of the current Vistawall folks- there is some serious uncertainty now on how they will be integrated into the new set up. Something tells me there's resumes being polished up right now- which means there could be some high level talent on the market soon.
-- From a pure PR standpoint you have to wonder if Bluescope jumped the gun with the announcement as they had their info out and ready but nothing from the other side. As a marketing guy, I can feel for the Oldcastle folks- your moment in the sun is moves like this and when it gets spoiled like the end of "Million Dollar Baby" it really takes the air out of the ball.
-- Actually the deal was spoiled by the Greeneville Sun newspaper when it reported on the deal on the 27th. The story is HERE. Evidently there was a tax abatement that needed transferred and the local paper was all over it. Unfortunately I don't check that site often.. or ever.
-- Consolidation is still the word of the day, but this deal continues to drive that consolidation is surely no longer an industry sector specific thing anymore. The cross over buys have been around for a while and will probably keep going in response to this deal.
-- Bottom line on the deal is how the cultures will mesh and integrate. Should be a very interesting process that is for sure.
Lastly I am sad the deal is over, the last week had record traffic coming here and now we go back to our regularly scheduled programming... but I promise I'll do my best to keep it interesting!
BREAKING! DONE DEAL
Oldcastle purchased Vistawall.
The first story can be found here- (click)
MUCH more on this I am sure on USGNN and on this blog.
UPDATE 9AM
The Press release from Blue Scope (Parent of Vistawall) is here.
Props by the way goes to the folks at USGlass who had the guts to run with this story back on May 17th.
I am sure that more info will be streaming today.
As for the "Smoke Screen" of someone else buying Vistawall, it is now pretty obvious that somewhere along the way, with the heat really coming down on this deal, that a semi-concerted effort was undertaken to try and throw folks off the path. Wow who would think about intrigue like that in our industry!!!
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
Interesting Rebate Reduction
Just tons of stuff again this week… and once again they’ll be another post end of the week- so please check on back.
Friday, June 22, 2007
Rumors- The Follow Up
Wow, talk about some rumors and BAM tons of interest and views of the blog follow! Wednesday’s post set a record for traffic to this site- so Thank you and feel free to bookmark this address and check back again.
-- Lastly for this extra “bonus” post for the week… the USGBC, rated as “From the Fabricator’s” Most Powerful organization (click here- scroll down) announced today that they will require at least 2 Optimize Energy Performance points. Now I take that as great news for our industry because that would mean that the desire to go to more efficient Low E’s like Guardian’s new SN 54 among others, as well as thermally improved spacer like Edgetech’s Tri Seal or Azon’s Warmlight would be welcomed in the big scheme of things. From the aluminum side, there are also products with thermal breaks that will provide the performances needed. So for our industry I take this as a plus. We still fall behind bike racks and waterless urinals, but we’re making strides.
Wednesday, June 20, 2007
About those rumors....
Several weeks ago, USGNN ran a piece on the possible sale of Vistawall to Oldcastle. After I did not mention in my next blog post, I got a spate of e-mails asking me why I hadn’t commented on it. Quite honestly I was hearing so many things, I really wasn’t comfortable coming out and posting my opinion. (Some rumors had different players, so much so that I thought one scenario had Oldcastle trading for Kobe Bryant) But now, with more info clearly flowing, this deal, Oldcastle buying Vistawall looks pretty much done. The only thing holding me back from saying it’s an absolute has been the unprecedented chatter surrounding this deal. Usually in plays this size, the communications are kept silent, but in this one, everyone’s talking so that’s odd. Which could mean it’s a lot of smoke screen. (((UPDATE! 6/20/07 It may actually be a smokescreen as now the hottest rumor is NOT Oldcastle buying Vistawall but another verrrry major player in the industry. Wow, my head is spinning, as soon as I get one more clarification, I'll let you in on who it is. But if it is, who I am hearing, its a stunner))) If and when it (Oldcastle) does, my thoughts on it are… from an Industry commenting standpoint, it’s an interesting deal. It’s another angle of consolidation with one side of the industry creeping onto the other side. Plus the culture issue will surely come into play, as from my view, they are not similar. From a personal standpoint, it’s an endorsement of the business model that Arch has worked for many, many years- being a one stop shop nationwide… or a “Single Source” if you will. I am sure they’ll be honored that Oldcastle is following in their footsteps. So stay tuned, we’ll see if and when the rumor becomes reality.
I have a few more items, but I am going to save those for a post later in the week… yes another week with multiple posts- but why not, with this blog growing the way it is, I don’t want to stunt the momentum. Plus I’ve been told if I go too long, I'll lose people, so gotta stay with my version of “Short Attention Span Theater”
Thursday, June 14, 2007
China & NFRC Update
Click- Money Cover Story- China-US Tensions
So it looks like congress may finally be stepping up and taking some action to curb the flow of communist Chinese material.
Also from Wednesday's USGNN the report from IGMA on the NFRC CMA issue.
Hallelujah!
Like I noted in my last post I was confident that AEC, GANA and IGMA were working to do the right thing by the industry and it sure appears that they are. Its a very long road and even an industry consensus will not stop the profiteering portion of people that basically make the rules and agenda within NFRC, but it is truly a good step.
By the way, it has been mentioned to me, alot more than once, that I should just chill out and let this all play out because if the NFRC is as out of tune as I say they are, then the proof will be in pudding. And that's an interesting angle. But I think I can still achieve both. Informing and educating the masses on what's going on and still watching them do what they do with a basic disregard for the fact that there's no glaring need or call for the intensity of the proposed action. (Remember I am all for a design tool to rate products, just not for all of the extra pork and policing that will go with it)
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
That "Great" Forecast
As you may have seen yet another market study was released last week touting the growth of Laminated and Tempered glass by 2011. The report had all of the basics, the great features that laminated and tempered offer and with new technologies really hitting stride, lots of value to be offered. However, this miraculous increase only comes to 1% per year. So unless I am reading it wrong, while business will improve, its only going to improve by 1%, and that paltry improvement will surely be equalized out by all of the other costs that affect business these days like health care, and utility prices. Not to mention more and more competition. So while it seems like everyone and their mother has a laminated autoclave on order, I wonder if they are truly seeing the big picture and understanding that there’s just not as much growth out there as it seems.
-- AAMA and IGMA are having their meetings right now and one item caught my eye. The issue of AAMA 507 being a welcome competitor to the current effort of NFRC to rate and police the commercial market was discussed. And the residential side of the membership took issue because they are worried that AAMA taking on NFRC would jeopardize the relationship the two organizations have. As noted AAMA does do work for the NFRC, and by promoting this, they may lose their gig there. So now the membership of AAMA really has a decision to make, do you want to be beholden to NFRC or do you not. If so, that’s fine, but then you should go the way of the WDMA and be all residential.
-- Like noted in the previous post, I have been getting a good amount of feedback on the NFRC CMA fees and the news surrounding it. The one question I got a lot was “is there any way that AIA would stand for it?” Well I can tell you that the NFRC has tried recently to get the AIA’s input on the program. They sent them this letter (click here) and asked for feedback. Problem is, the letter was typical NFRC (vague) and it was probably scanned by someone at AIA before being thrown away. Not only that, their reaction after reading pages 2 and 3 would be “I’m not doing this crap” but the best part? There’s 995 words on 3 full pages and the words “Cost” “Fee” or "Code" are not on any them! So I guess by reading this letter it’s a free program right? So why, if I am the AIA, should I care, it’s a free voluntary program- not gonna cost me or my client a dime!!! So when you hear that the NFRC asked for feedback, you know what they sent and the "details" that they conveniently left out.
Feel free to visit the USGNN message boards here to join the comments on Father’s day.
The video this week is honor of Bob Barker- who is calling it quits from hosting The Price Is Right. Great blooper here where the contestant says what I think Bob is probably thinking!
Friday, June 08, 2007
Passing the time while stranded
Since I am stuck in an airport waiting on a flight that has been delayed due to the stormy midwest, I figure why not do a quick update on the blog…
Thanks for the update on NFRC. You mention
Great question. As far as I know they are not paying anything but considering this whole latest debacle was rushed into action because of
So now that “request/demand” gave the NFRC another excuse and an impetus to get this program fast tracked. So yes the CEC, which seemingly has a guaranteed seat on the NFRC board, should step up and pay or at worst convince the energy companies in
Monday, June 04, 2007
It's Here....
Well if you expected me to lead off this post with anything other than Monday’s NFRC news, then you sadly were wrong. There’s no way I could not talk about the release of the “fees” associated with the program. I was quoted in the USGNN piece and I can not stress a few things enough, most of which, is these costs will be passed all the way through, forcing the glazing contractors to get after their customers for payment. The confusion and ire this program will cause will be epic. But then again I have been hammering this for a few years… so what’s new?
The biggest thing that is new is the release of the costs and it just sends the message home even more on how real this is. These will be costs that will have to be explained up the food chain as I guarantee you when it hits states outside of
As for the info itself, the NFRC release was typically cryptic. I’d expect nothing less from them really. But what kills me is their desire to make their investment back in such a quick time period, they are afterall a non-profit, yet unlike most non profits that would do something this bold, NFRC wants to get back to level a lot quicker. Plus it’s amazing that NFRC continues to live off the backs of only part of their membership that pays the bills. Yes in case you don’t know, product manufacturers and installers pay on a sliding scale based on total company sales. While the people who will benefit from this new program, because they will be the testers and inspectors, pay a cool $400. Shouldn’t it the other way around? Shouldn’t the people who will profit tremendously be the ones paying on a scale, while the people who have to adhere to the rules and still PAY to have services performed pay the simple low rate?
Remember the NFRC and the main group that dominates them (test labs and inspection agencies) will say how they experienced resistance on the residential side and how great their program works over there. Well while it works or not is truly up to the eye of the beholder, I can’t ever get by the fact that NFRC has never figured out that commercial building is as different from residential as I am from Mike Tyson. It’s not even close, yet it was that impetus and the desire to oversee another industry that brought this on.
(And at this point, I’ll be accused of making things up, but it was an NFRC board member who publicly stated a few years ago in a NFRC meeting that the Commercial industry was an “untapped” market- then when that was brought to light is when all of a sudden NFRC started to “dig up” all of the reasons they have for doing this)
And the bottom line… It’s absolutely pathetic we find ourselves in this position… being dictated to by a profiteering group of test labs and inspection agencies that are given carte blanche by a sound asleep group at the Department of Energy. While I have said it before and I will say it again, our industry has nothing to hide and is more than open for a creation of a system to calculate full system values. However when that system is built by people who have zero interest in our industry, zero clue on how the industry works, zero care about what we do, and zero desire to talk and LISTEN to the people this will truly affect (Building Owners, Architects, General Contractors, Glaziers, Suppliers etc). Yes this program goes forward despite all that…
Saturday, June 02, 2007
China and Human RIghts
It's also an article that is not blind to some of the realities of the situation. An interesting read if you have a few minutes.